Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635865›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026

Peptides in Regenerative Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Applications in Tissue Repair and Chronic Pain Management.

Choopong Luansritisakul, Michael C Chiang, Stacey L Burns, Alexandra C G Fonseca

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Choopong LuansritisakulDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5148-9529
Michael C ChiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-7812
Stacey L BurnsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Alexandra C G FonsecaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. afonseca3@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9735-3184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review summarizes the current evidence on regenerative peptides relevant to chronic pain management, including collagen peptides, body protection compound-157 (BPC-157), thymosin beta-4 (TB-4), thymosin beta-500 (TB-500), glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine copper (GHK-Cu), growth hormone-related peptides, and cibinetide (ARA-290). We review their proposed mechanisms of action, potential clinical applications, preclinical and clinical evidence, safety profiles, and regulatory status. RECENT

findingsChronic pain imposes a substantial global burden, yet conventional management strategies often fail to achieve durable, long-term outcomes and primarily focus on symptom control. Regenerative medicine has emerged as a promising alternative by targeting tissue repair and restoration. Among the various therapeutic approaches within regenerative medicine, peptide-based therapies have gained significant attention in recent decades, with growing evidence supporting the efficacy of these interventions. Despite their therapeutic potential, evidence regarding the role of regenerative peptides in chronic pain management remains limited. By synthesizing the available literature, this review aims to provide an evidence-based framework for understanding the potential role of these therapeutic peptides in chronic pain management. However, because most of these therapies remain unapproved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and clinical evidence in humans is limited, their use should be guided by careful clinical judgment and ongoing evaluation of emerging evidence.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementPeptidesRegenerative MedicineAnimalsHumansThymosinPeptidesThymosinBPC-157Chronic painMusculoskeletal painPeptidesRegenerative medicineTissue repair

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.