ReviewOnline journal of public health informatics2026
Impact of Patient Portals on Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Related Quality-of-Care Outcomes: Systematic Review.
Review in Online journal of public health informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient portals are increasingly used to support self-management and facilitate care coordination in people with chronic diseases. Although some asthma quality-of-care gains and modest chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) improvements have been reported in wider digital health studies, a comprehensive review of patient portal-specific evidence is lacking. Objective: This study aimed to systematically synthesize evidence on the impacts of patient portals on adult asthma and COPD outcomes across 6 quality-of-care domains (effectiveness, patient-centeredness, equity, efficiency, safety, and timeliness). Methods: We searched 5 databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) for quantitative evaluations published up to March 2026 (CRD42022316044). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 tool were used for quality assessments, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Findings were narratively synthesized using the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) framework. Results: We identified 4038 records, and 16 papers published between 2007 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria (asthma=13, COPD=2, both=1). Three were randomized controlled trials, all rated high risk of bias. Of the other studies, 5 had low risk, 6 had moderate risk, and 2 had high risk of bias. Effectiveness and patient-centeredness were most frequently reported, with 12 papers each. Eight papers were on equity, 5 each on efficiency and safety, and 4 on timeliness. In asthma, modest disease control improvements were reported in 27.8% (42/151) of participants using patient portals with home visit support versus portal use alone (35/150, 23.3%). In COPD, one large, interrupted time series study (N=909,724) reported post-implementation reductions in hospitalizations (slope change from 1.33 to -4.38 per 10,000 patients per month; Conclusions: This review found low to very low certainty of evidence on the impacts of patient portals on quality of care for asthma and COPD. While modest disease control improvements and short-term quality-of-life gains were noted in asthma, and reduced hospitalizations in COPD were observed, the evidence base remains limited and methodologically weak. This review cautions against a reliance on patient portals for clinical management of asthma and COPD and highlights that more methodologically robust primary studies are needed to identify how portal functions may yield clinically meaningful benefits for patients with chronic respiratory disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.