Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42636573›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Effects of microbial-phytase co-fermentation of sorghum on growth performance, nutrient utilization, digestive enzyme activities and cecal microbiota in meat ducks.

Junlei Chang, Yu Deng, Jianqi Yang, Yang Liu, Leizheng Zhang, Dongmei Xie, Xuemei Ding, Jianping Wang, Yan Liu, Qiufeng Zeng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Junlei ChangKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Yu DengKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Jianqi YangKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Yang LiuKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Leizheng ZhangKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Dongmei XieSichuan Grassland Technology Research and Promotion Center, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Xuemei DingKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Jianping WangKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Yan LiuKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Qiufeng ZengKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Shiping BaiKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Keying ZhangKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
Gang JiaKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China. Electronic address: jiagang700510@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the nutritional value and feeding effects of microbial-phytase co-fermented sorghum (MPCFS) in Cherry Valley meat ducks. MPCFS was prepared by fermentation with Bacillus subtilis, Candida utilis, and phytase. In experiment 1, 128 male ducks (22 days old) received a basal diet, diets replacing 30% of the basal diet with sorghum or MPCFS, or a nitrogen free diet to assess nutrients digestibility. In experiment 2, 240 male ducks (15 days old) were fed for 21 days with either a corn soybean meal diet or diets in which 70% of corn was substituted with sorghum or MPCFS. The results indicated that MPCFS significantly increased crude protein (CP), acid soluble protein (ASP), and ash in sorghum, while reducing phytic acid (PA) and fiber contents (P < 0.05). Moreover, MPCFS significantly improved the digestibility of CP, ether extract (EE), zinc (Zn), phosphorus (P), and gross energy (GE) (P < 0.05), alongside increasing the apparent metabolizable energy (AME) and the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of Leu, Lys, Met, Val, His, and Trp (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, compared with the sorghum group, the MPCFS diet significantly increased 35 day body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG), and decreased the feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, substituting corn with MPCFS significantly enhanced duodenal amylase, lipase and trypsin activities (P < 0.05). In the cecum, compared with the sorghum, MPCFS significantly increased cecal acetate, propionate, and butyrate concentrations (P < 0.05). Microbial analysis revealed that MPCFS improved cecal microbial α diversity in meat ducks, increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Phascolarctobacterium, and decreased that of Fusobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Desulfovibrio, and Streptococcus (P < 0.05). Collectively, MPCFS improved sorghum utilization in meat ducks by enhancing nutrient digestibility, digestive function, cecal short-chain fatty acid production, and gut microbial composition.

Indexed as

Growth performanceMeat duckMicrobial-phytase co-fermented sorghumNutrient utilization

Identifiers

PMID42636573
PMCPMC13542589

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.