ArticleHealthcare informatics research2026
Prediction of Postoperative Length of Stay in Patients with Hip Fracture: A Two-Stage Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to apply machine learning (ML) techniques to predict postoperative length of stay (LOS) in patients with hip fracture. Because LOS varies widely across individuals owing to complex clinical factors, accurate prediction remains challenging. To address this challenge, an enhanced two-stage approach was developed and compared with a conventional one-stage approach.
methodsData from 3,118 surgically treated patients with hip fracture were extracted from a hospital information system. Demographic and perioperative variables were analyzed, and the dataset was divided into training and test sets at a 70:30 ratio. ML algorithms were applied using a two-stage modeling approach. In the first stage, a classification model categorized LOS as short stay or long stay. In the second stage, regression models predicted the number of hospital days within each group. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score for classification and mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean relative error (MRE) for regression.
resultsIn the one-stage approach, the support vector machine model showed the lowest prediction error, with an MAE of 2.20, RMSE of 3.18, and MRE of 0.42. The two-stage approach, which integrated classification and regression, outperformed the onestage approach, achieving an MAE of 1.46, RMSE of 1.86, and MRE of 0.35.
conclusionsThe two-stage approach outperformed the one-stage approach, suggesting that LOS stratification improves prediction accuracy. This improvement may help hospitals anticipate resource needs, plan postoperative care, and manage bed allocation more effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.