ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
LASSO-based nomogram and machine learning models for predicting 30-day nasogastric tube dependence after acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding is a common method for providing enteral nutrition to patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and dysphagia. However, prolonged NGT dependence contributes to adverse clinical consequences. Early identification of patients who may develop persistent NGT dependence remains challenging. Methods: A total of 852 AIS patients requiring NGT were included and allocated to the training ( Results: Four key independent predictors were retained: Diabetes Mellitus (DM), age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and exclusive NGT feeding. The model demonstrated strong discrimination (AUC = 0.924 in training, 0.920 in internal validation, and 0.935 in external validation), good calibration, and favorable clinical utility in DCA. Among the machine learning models, GBM demonstrated the highest accuracy, with an AUC of 0.918. The model confirmed age and NIHSS score as the most influential predictors, followed by exclusive NGT feeding and DM. Conclusion: The developed nomogram provides an effective approach for predicting 30-day NGT dependence in AIS patients, enabling timely risk stratification and individualized clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.