Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42638957›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026

Vicious cycle: the bidirectional relationship and pathophysiological mechanisms of tinnitus and sleep disturbance.

Jiawei Sun, Difei Li, Jing Jin, Yu Tian, Hui Leng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiawei Sun *First Clinical College of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Difei Li *Clinical Medicine, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jing JinFirst Clinical College of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Yu TianFirst Clinical College of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Hui LengDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In sleep medicine and otology, the comorbidity of tinnitus and sleep disturbance may constitute a debilitating vicious cycle: intrusive phantom auditory perceptions disrupt sleep, whereas poor-quality, nonrestorative sleep further intensifies tinnitus-related distress and perceptual prominence, substantially compromising patients' health. Recent neurophysiological and clinical studies suggest that this comorbidity is not a simple causal relationship but may be driven by shared central nervous system mechanisms. Persistent central hyperexcitability, maladaptive neuroplasticity within auditory-limbic networks, and cognitive-behavioral processes resembling those of primary insomnia have been proposed as key pathophysiological drivers; multimodal interventions targeting these nodes may therefore be beneficial. This review systematically integrates clinical, psychological, and neurobiological evidence supporting this bidirectional association and delineates the reciprocal relationship and pathological mechanisms linking tinnitus and sleep disturbance. We also discuss the implications for future clinical management, advocate a shift toward comprehensive assessment and personalized multimodal intervention, and identify key opportunities and challenges for future research.

Indexed as

Sleep Wake DisordersTinnitusHumansbidirectional relationshipcomorbiditypathophysiological mechanismsleep disturbancetinnitus

Identifiers

PMID42638957
PMCPMC13500341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.