ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Use of artificial intelligence in building personal branding and intercultural leadership.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of AI tools reshaping how professionals learn, build reputation, and project their value in digitally and culturally diverse environments. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the relationships among AI tool use, personal branding, and leadership in intercultural contexts. A quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional, and correlational study was conducted with 169 university graduates from Peru, Ecuador, and Mexico. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed through descriptive analysis, exploratory factor analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and K-means clustering. The results indicate that 89.3% reported familiarity with AI tools, even though 79.3% had not received specialized training. Two profiles were also identified: one with moderate familiarity and another with greater technological appropriation, professional visibility, and intercultural competence. The PCA showed that the first two components explained 47.7% of the variance, with intercultural leadership, professional visibility, and technology adoption forming the central dimensions of the model. The results suggest that the use of artificial intelligence tools is associated with better career prospects when accompanied by critical judgment, authenticity, and cultural sensitivity. They also highlight the need to develop digital, ethical, and intercultural competencies in universities and organizations in order to guide relevant and responsible professional development processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.