ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnea: a contemporary review.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects up to one billion adults worldwide and is associated with hypertension, cardiometabolic disease, neurocognitive decline, and increased all-cause mortality. While continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains first-line therapy, more than half of patients are intolerant or non-adherent, leaving a substantial population at sustained risk. Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is one of the most effective surgical treatments for anatomically driven OSA to reconstruct a functional and patent airway, achieving approximately 80% reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index, durable improvements in nocturnal oxygenation, daytime function, and quality of life. Beyond standard apnea metrics, evidence links MMA-mediated correction of intermittent hypoxia to attenuation of oxidative stress, sympathetic hyperactivation, and cellular senescence pathways implicated in accelerated aging which positions MMA as a potentially disease-modifying intervention with implications for longevity. In this review, we synthesize the contemporary evidence on patient selection, surgical planning, magnitude of advancement, complications, and comparison with alternative therapies, and we identify key research gaps including the absence of long-term cardiovascular endpoints, head-to-head comparisons with hypoglossal nerve stimulation, and MMA-specific cost-effectiveness data. MMA should be considered not merely as craniofacial corrective surgery but as a definitive, healthspan-relevant treatment for selected patients with OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.