Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639313›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026

Maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnea: a contemporary review.

Martin Kauke-Navarro, Derek Steinbacher, Ali-Farid Safi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin Kauke-NavarroDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Derek SteinbacherWest River Surgery Center, Guilford, CT, United States.
Ali-Farid SafiCraniologicum, Center for Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects up to one billion adults worldwide and is associated with hypertension, cardiometabolic disease, neurocognitive decline, and increased all-cause mortality. While continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains first-line therapy, more than half of patients are intolerant or non-adherent, leaving a substantial population at sustained risk. Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is one of the most effective surgical treatments for anatomically driven OSA to reconstruct a functional and patent airway, achieving approximately 80% reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index, durable improvements in nocturnal oxygenation, daytime function, and quality of life. Beyond standard apnea metrics, evidence links MMA-mediated correction of intermittent hypoxia to attenuation of oxidative stress, sympathetic hyperactivation, and cellular senescence pathways implicated in accelerated aging which positions MMA as a potentially disease-modifying intervention with implications for longevity. In this review, we synthesize the contemporary evidence on patient selection, surgical planning, magnitude of advancement, complications, and comparison with alternative therapies, and we identify key research gaps including the absence of long-term cardiovascular endpoints, head-to-head comparisons with hypoglossal nerve stimulation, and MMA-specific cost-effectiveness data. MMA should be considered not merely as craniofacial corrective surgery but as a definitive, healthspan-relevant treatment for selected patients with OSA.

Indexed as

apnea–hypopnea indexcardiometabolic healthlongevitymaxillomandibular advancementobstructive sleep apneaorthognathic surgerysleep surgery

Identifiers

PMID42639313
PMCPMC13501148

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.