Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639496›Full record

ArticleKDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining2026

Why Only 3D for 3D? 2D-Guided Supervision for 3D Medical Vision-Language Models.

Qilong Zhao, Ziyuan Qin, Liang Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qilong ZhaoDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ziyuan QinDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Liang ZhaoDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Explainable and Ethical AI for Studying Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG089806 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES J LAH, Deqiang Qiu · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
SCH: Visual explanation-guided learning for human-AI collaborative abdominal cancer diagnostic imagingR01CA297856 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Liang Zhao · 2024 to 2026
$872k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA297856NIA NIH HHS R01 AG089806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training 3D medical vision-language models (VLMs) requires paired volumetric scans and expert annotations such as reports or segmentation masks, which are costly and limited. Meanwhile, large collections of unlabeled 3D scans and strong 2D medical VLMs are increasingly available. We study a simple paradigm: using pretrained 2D models as automatic annotators to supervise 3D VLMs. A 2D teacher generates slice-level descriptions or masks that are aggregated into volume-level pseudo-labels to train a 3D student operating on full volumes at inference. We instantiate this 2D-to-3D supervision framework for report generation and segmentation. In label-scarce regimes, 2D-derived pseudo-labels significantly improve data efficiency. For report generation, pseudo-reports outperform or match ground truth when reports are limited and remain competitive at larger scales. For segmentation, pseudo-masks enable learning from unlabeled volumes and further improve performance when combined with limited expert masks. Overall, strong 2D models can act as scalable annotators that complement scarce 3D labels. This data-centric perspective offers a practical path to scaling 3D medical VLMs by leveraging abundant 2D expertise without changing model architectures.

Indexed as

3D medical imagingknowledge distillationmedical report generationvision-language models

Identifiers

PMID42639496
PMCPMC13502129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.