ArticleThoracic cancer2026
Decision-Support Framework for Nutritional Risk in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Time-Series Model Using Imputation Strategies for Incomplete Clinical Data.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), nutritional status is a key determinant of disease progression, treatment tolerance, and prognosis. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), reflecting both immune and nutritional conditions, is widely used to evaluate prognostic risk, but its longitudinal monitoring is often limited by incomplete clinical data in real-world settings. This study aimed to propose a decision-support framework for predicting future nutritional status and improving risk screening in SCLC patients with missing data. Using PNI values and related variables from the first four follow-up time points to predict the PNI at the fifth time point (PNI5) and evaluated the impact of different missing data imputation strategies on predictive performance. Missing PNI values were imputed using mean imputation, multiple imputation (MI), Kalman filtering, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and XGBoost imputation. Predictive models were developed with two machine learning algorithms: random forest (RF) and XGBoost. The RF model demonstrated better overall performance, and MI combined with RF achieved the best predictive accuracy (MAE: 2.952; RMSE: 3.727). Predicted PNI values were further translated into risk categories using a predefined threshold (PNI = 45), with overall accuracy of 93.33%, PPV 95.24%, and NPV 92.59%. Importantly, the model enabled risk assessment in patients with incomplete laboratory data, covering previously unassessable cases and reducing monitoring gaps. This study highlights the importance of appropriate imputation strategies in and provides a practical tool for continuous nutritional risk assessment and early identification of high-risk patients in SCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.