ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
Effect of Consecutive Jumping Trials on Metatarsophalangeal, Ankle, Knee and Hip Biomechanics During Take-Off and Landing: A Replication and Extension Study.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Replication is a fundamental aspect of scientific research, but few replications have been conducted within sports biomechanics yet. The aim of this study was to closely replicate Lam et al. (2021) study, investigating the differences of single and consecutive jump landing trials on ground reaction forces, metatarsophalangeal joint, ankle joint and knee joint kinematics and kinetics. We extended the analysis by including the hip joint biomechanics. Forty basketball players performed single and consecutive countermovement jumps (CMJ) tasks. Synchronised motion capture system and force plates were used to compute biomechanical variables during take-off and landing. Paired t-tests were performed to examine any significant effect of the task. The compatibility of the replication and original effect size estimates was evaluated with z-tests. The consecutive jumping task led to lower jump height, takeoff velocity and vertical ground reaction forces at landing for both studies. Unlike the original study, metatarsophalangeal joint, ankle joint, and knee joint velocities and powers were greater in single countermovement jump condition compared to consecutive condition. Additionally, the hip joint displayed larger velocities and power during take-off in the single CMJ condition compared to consecutive CMJ condition. The present study couldn't replicate most of the original findings, as the effect of consecutive jump on most of the joint kinematics and kinetics results was not consistent between the two studies. We recommend authors to describe the level of practice of their population and to adopt Open Science principles to build higher confidence in the sports sciences results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.