ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Chromatin accessibility classification of TAD boundaries discloses new architectural proteins.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-TADB predicts TAD boundaries without Hi-C by integrating DNA sequences and epigenomic features.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- FACT depletion demonstrates a role for nucleosome organization in TAD formation.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D genome organization is crucial to modulate gene expression. Topologically associating domain boundaries isolate genes and their regulatory elements within the same topological neighborhood, avoiding crosstalk between regulatory elements. Perturbation of domain boundaries causes aberrant genomic contacts and gene expression misregulation. CTCF and the cohesin complex are critical to form boundaries through loop extrusion. However, we still lack a complete understanding of what makes a boundary more effective at insulating genomic contacts than others. Here, we experimentally classified boundaries according to their chromatin accessibility as a proxy of protein occupancy in K562 human cells. Highly accessible boundaries are occupied by more proteins including CTCF, are more robust contact insulators, have a more conserved CTCF DNA-binding motif, and are more conserved across cell types. By exploring proteins enriched at boundaries with different accessibility, we found that CTCF and cohesin bind together with REST forming one module, while ZNF316 and EMSY form another, both occupying boundaries very frequently. CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of the ZNF316/EMSY binding region at a robust CTCF-free boundary increases inter-domain contacts, demonstrating that this module contributes to chromatin insulation. Our results emphasize the importance of protein combination and abundance in boundary strength and identify ZNF316/EMSY as a novel chromatin insulator module.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.