ArticlePlanta2026
More is not always better: phosphorus context shapes the effectiveness of single-strain and consortium plant growth-promoting bacteria in tomato.
Article in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionPhosphorus availability determines whether single or consortium PGPB maximize tomato performance, demonstrating that rational inoculant design should prioritize functional complementarity over increasing microbial complexity. Phosphorus (P) availability is a major constraint for crop development and productivity, and beneficial bacteria are increasingly proposed to enhance plant P-acquisition efficiency. However, their comparative performance remains variable across studies and experimental contexts. This study investigated whether single plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) strains and a defined bacterial consortium differentially modulate P nutrition and early growth of tomato under contrasting P availability. Tomato plants were grown hydroponically in a factorial design combining single-strain inoculations (Azospirillum brasilense, Pantoea agglomerans, Priestia aryabhattai), a defined consortium, and a non-inoculated control under five P regimes differing in concentration and chemical form (soluble vs. insoluble). Plant growth and root architecture traits were evaluated alongside ionomics and targeted expression analysis of SlPHT1 transporters, thus linking plant performance with nutrient status and regulation. Results indicated that P. agglomerans showed the most stable benefits under soluble P, while A. brasilense strongly promoted adaptive root and transporter responses under moderate limitation. P. aryabhattai induced subtler growth effects but reshaped nutrient associations, particularly with insoluble P. By contrast, the consortium did not consistently outperform single strains and showed clear advantages only when insoluble P was the sole source. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of single versus multi-strain inoculation is strongly context-dependent and emerges from the interaction between P availability, strain identity, and plant response integration. Accordingly, effective consortia should be designed based on functional complementarity and balance, rather than on increasing inoculant complexity, as overlapping PGP traits may lead to non-additive or even counterproductive effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.