ArticleAdvances in therapy2026
Physician and Patient Perception of Disease, Symptomatology, and Treatment Administration Preference in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haemoglobinuria: Results from a Real-World Survey.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionParoxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is an ultra-rare condition, characterised by complement-mediated red blood cell breakdown, resulting in haemolytic anaemia. Associated symptoms, such as fatigue, impact on patient quality of life. Little is known about the comparative perceptions of symptom burden and treatment preferences among patients and physicians.
methodsThis study analysed secondary data from the Adelphi Real World PNH Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and patients with PNH in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, China, and Japan conducted January-November 2022. Haematologists and haematologist-oncologists reported demographic and clinical data for ≤10 consecutive consulting adult patients with PNH. Only patients with both physician-reported and patient-reported data were included in the study. Patients and physicians reported on clinical signs and symptom burden, treatment satisfaction, and preferred route of administration. Bivariate analyses were used to compare physician and patient responses.
resultsForty-two physicians reported data for 225 patients. Median (interquartile range) patient age was 44.0 (35.0-56.0), 56.9% were male and 96.0% received treatment at survey. Most common clinical signs and symptoms were fatigue, anaemia, haemoglobinuria, dyspnoea, and headaches. All common signs/symptoms, except haemoglobinuria, were reported as significantly more frequent and severe by patients than physicians (p < 0.05). Most bothersome signs/symptoms reported were anaemia (physicians: 31.3%, patients: 21.3%) and fatigue (physicians: 29.9%, patients: 45.5%). Physicians were significantly more satisfied with treatment than patients (p < 0.001), regardless of treatment. Although oral administration was preferred by both physicians (60.2%) and patients (74.2%), there was significant difference in overall preference (p < 0.001), with 30.8% of physicians preferring intravenous administration, compared to 16.3% of patients.
conclusionThere was significant patient-physician disconnect in perception of PNH symptoms burden, treatment satisfaction, and administration preferences. Improved communication and patient involvement in disease management may contribute to optimised patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640434What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.