Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42640957›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Brachyury expression levels predict lineage potential and axis-forming ability of in vitro-derived neuromesodermal progenitors.

Anahí Binagui-Casas, Anna Granés, Alberto S Ceccarelli, Matthew French, Filip J Wymeersch, Rosa Portero Migueles, Jennifer Annoh, Yali Huang, Eleni P Karagianni, Frederick C K Wong and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Anahí Binagui-CasasInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-9286
Anna GranésInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alberto S CeccarelliSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Matthew FrenchDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Filip J WymeerschRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan.
Rosa Portero MiguelesInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jennifer AnnohInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Yali HuangDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Eleni P KaragianniGSK, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Frederick C K WongThe Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Raffee WrightInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-9035
Anna Sophie BrummInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Daniel Lopez RamajoImmunology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapy, School of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Minoru TakasatoRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan.
Sally LowellInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Osvaldo CharaSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Valerie WilsonInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4182-5159

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromesodermal progenitors (NMPs) produce the spinal cord and musculoskeleton in the elongating anterior-posterior axis. In vivo, NMPs possess dual potency, coinciding with regions co-expressing SOX2 and Brachyury (TBXT). In vitro, SOX2/TBXT co-expressing cells can be produced from pluripotent cells and, like their in vivo counterparts, can produce neural tube and somitic mesoderm. However, the functional characteristics of in vitro SOX2/TBXT co-expressing cells remain unclear, confounding comparisons with in vivo data. To address this, we developed a dual Sox2/Tbxt reporter mouse ESC line. SOX2/TBXT reporter-positive cells emerge in vitro from pluripotent populations with dynamics that mirror their appearance in the embryo. Purified SOX2/TBXT co-expressing populations can differentiate towards neurectoderm or mesoderm, including lateral mesoderm upon BMP stimulation. In gastruloids, quantitative live imaging shows that WNT or NOTCH inhibition rapidly leads to downregulation of TBXT expression and diminished axial extension. We show that clonally plated SOX2/TBXT co-expressing cells are bipotent NMPs that can also self-propagate. By combining clonal analysis with mathematical inference, we identify two thresholds of TBXT and/or SOX2 expression, switching clonal output from neural- to mesoderm-biased, and from mesoderm-biased to mesoderm-specified. Image analysis of embryonic NMPs supports a model whereby SOX2 and TBXT independently influence neuromesodermal differentiation. Thus, this Sox2/Tbxt double reporter cell line highlights unsuspected heterogeneity in NMPs, and together with image analysis of embryonic SOX2/TBXT levels, challenges the assumption that neuromesodermal fate choice is primarily governed by mutual antagonism between SOX2/TBXT.

Indexed as

Fetal ProteinsMesodermNeural Stem CellsT-Box Domain ProteinsAnimalsBrachyury ProteinCell DifferentiationCell LineCell LineageGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsSOXB1 Transcription FactorsBrachyury ProteinFetal ProteinsSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription FactorsT-Box Domain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42640957
PMCPMC13533433

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.