Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643190›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026

Lifetime risk of respiratory system cancers across 185 countries: Global variation, socioeconomic inequalities, and ecological associations with air pollution.

Meng Jiang, Yu Qian, Qilong Wang, Xiumin Zhou, Hong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meng JiangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yu QianThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Qilong WangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiumin ZhouThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hong XuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the lifetime risks of developing and dying from respiratory system cancers across 185 countries and territories and to examine their associations with socioeconomic development and air pollution. Methods: GLOBOCAN 2022 data for 185 countries and territories were combined with United Nations life tables to estimate lifetime risks using an adjusted-for-multiple-primaries framework. Country-level air pollution indicators for 2022 were obtained from OpenWeather. Estimates were stratified by Human Development Index (HDI) and World Bank income groups, and associations between lifetime risk and PM2.5, PM10, NO2, and SO2 were assessed using univariable linear regression. Results: Globally, the lifetime risk of developing and dying from lung cancer was 4.92% and 4.08%, respectively, far exceeding those for laryngeal cancer (0.33% and 0.20%). A marked socioeconomic gradient was identified: lung cancer incidence risk ranged from 0.34% in low-HDI countries to 5.45% in very high-HDI countries. All four pollutants were positively associated with lifetime risk, with PM2.5 showing the strongest correlation in the primary univariable analyses. Conclusions: Substantial geographic and socioeconomic disparities exist in respiratory cancer lifetime risk, with lung cancer as the dominant driver. The observed ecological associations with air pollutants support further investigation of environmental factors in cancer prevention.

Indexed as

Air pollutionIncidenceIncomeLifetime riskMortalityRespiratory system cancers

Identifiers

PMID42643190
PMCPMC13503087

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.