ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2026
Constructing a Bayesian neural network model for the cross-sectional classification of psychological distress among older adults: comprehensive analysis of humor styles, communication skills, and physical activity experiences.
Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a model for the cross-sectional classification of psychological distress among older adults, using a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) to examine the relationships among humor expressions, communication skills, physical activity (PA), and social PA experiences (with friends), and their effects on psychological distress risk. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 5,265 Japanese adults aged 65 to 89 years. The predictor variables included humor expressions, communication skills, and social PA experiences. Depression was assessed using the K6 Psychological Distress Scale (cutoff ≥ 9). A BNN with three hidden layers was constructed with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for feature importance identification. Results: The BNN model achieved 81.1% accuracy for high-risk detection. This study revealed self-enhancing humor coping and self-control communication skills as the strongest protective factors. Additionally, past PA experiences with friends and present PA experiences alone reduced the risk for K6-assessed psychological distress. Conclusion: The BNN model identified positive humor styles, self-controlled communication abilities, past social PA, and present PA status as important predictors of contributors to the model output for classifying K6-assessed psychological distress among older adults, highlighting the potential relevance of social engagement in communication and PA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.