ArticleJHLT open2026
The impact of preoperative mechanical support on long-term survival following early lung re-transplantation for graft failure.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Severe graft failure after lung transplantation is a devastating outcome with limited therapeutic options. Mechanical support provides temporary stabilization but may compromise re-transplantation candidacy. This study examined postoperative outcomes and long-term survival of graft failure re-transplants by preoperative mechanical support use. Methods: The UNOS database was queried for adults undergoing early re-transplantation for graft failure (EGF) performed within 1 year of the primary transplant from 2005 to 2025. Primary transplants, multiorgan, and re-transplants from unknown causes were excluded. Patients were stratified by preoperative mechanical support use (ventilation and/or ECMO). The primary outcome was 5-year survival. Results: Among 1453 re-transplants, 140 (9.6%) were for EGF. 85 (61%) required preoperative mechanical support (61%), and 55 did not (39%). Within the mechanical support group, 72 (85%) were ventilated, 44 (52%) received ECMO, and 31 (36%) had both ECMO and ventilation. Supported patients had higher LAS scores (89.3 vs 71.6, Conclusion: Preoperative mechanical support was associated with greater postoperative morbidity and worse long-term survival. These findings underscore the need to critically evaluate whether re-transplantation truly benefits this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.