ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Plasma multi-miRNA models classify Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Lewy body dementia.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD) from both Parkinson's disease (PD) and Lewy body dementia (DLB) is difficult due to their clinical similarities. Plasma biomarkers offer an alternative to neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis; however, there are limitations with respect to differential diagnosis of AD, PD, and DLB with current clinical assays. Methods: Here we used machine learning to assess plasma miRNAs for their specificity in diagnosing AD vs. PD, and DLB. Our multi-center study assayed 57 AD-associated miRNAs in human plasma from 82 cognitively normal controls (NC), 87 AD, 100 PD, and 20 DLB. Predictive models generated by three independent machine learning methods were evaluated by cross-validated ROC curves [cvAUC (bootstrap bias-corrected 95% CI)]. We also used linear discriminant analysis with all 57 miRNAs to identify a model that best separates AD from PD + DLB participants and DLB from AD+PD participants. Further, we used Target prediction and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to identify highly relevant mRNA targets of the miRNAs. Results: Individual assessment of the 57 miRNAs identified a subset of 10 miRNAs that were more AD-specific, and 23 miRNAs that were more PD and/or DLB associated. Ridge logistic regression predictive models with the 10 AD-specific miRNAs had good performance for separating AD vs. PD and DLB (cvAUC = 0.77 [0.70, 0.83]) and AD vs. PD (cvAUC = 0.79 [0.71, 0.85]), but not for AD vs. DLB (cvAUC = 0.58 [0.43, 0.79]). By developing a predictive model using data from all 57 miRNAs and elastic-net regression we achieved good separation of AD from PD (cvAUC = 0.80 [0.72, 0.86]) and DLB (cvAUC = 0.77 [0.64, 0.87]) with a subset of six miRNAs (miRs-19a-3p, 22-3p, 92b-3p, 101-3p, 143-3p, 423-5p) identified as the most important to these models. The linear discriminant analysis model achieved very good classification of AD vs. PD + DLB (cvAUC = 0.94 [0.87, 0.97]), PD from AD+DLB (cvAUC = 0.88 [0.80, 0.92]), and DLB from AD+PD (cvAUC = 0.85 [0.78, 0.89]) with miR-26a-5p and 146a-5p being most important for AD vs. PD + DLB, and miR-142-3p and 101-3p being most important for DLB vs. AD+PD. Target prediction and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis with miR-26a-5p, 146a-5p, 142-3p, 101-3p returned highly relevant mRNA targets associated with tauopathy, dementia, and movement disorders. Discussion: These data demonstrate that predictive modeling using plasma miRNA expression data may improve the differential diagnosis of AD from PD from DLB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.