ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Delayed shifts in salivary microbiota composition following long-term use of 0.06% chlorhexidine toothpaste.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chlorhexidine is a standard antiseptic in periodontal therapy, yet its long-term impact on the commensal oral microbiota and antimicrobial resistance remains unclear. Objective: This study evaluated the ecological effects of 0.06% chlorhexidine toothpaste on the salivary microbiota of healthy individuals, focusing on taxonomic composition, functional shifts, and prevalence of predicted antimicrobial resistance pathways. Methods: This study was designed as a prospective, single-arm interventional trial to evaluate the temporal dynamics of the oral microbiota. Saliva samples were collected from eleven healthy participants at three specific time points: baseline (following a 4-week run-in period using a reference fluoride toothpaste), intervention (after 12 weeks of using 0.06% chlorhexidine digluconate toothpaste), and washout (after a subsequent 12-week period using the reference fluoride toothpaste). Sequencing targeted the 16S rRNA V3-V4 region. Results: Alpha diversity remained stable throughout the study. However, beta diversity analysis revealed significant shifts in community structure, which were most pronounced between the intervention and washout phases. We identified forty-one differentially abundant metabolic pathways, including a significant downregulation of predicted beta-lactam resistance pathways during the washout period. While chlorhexidine did not increase predicted resistance-related pathways, delayed compositional shifts toward gram-negative taxa were observed at the end of the 12-week washout period. Conclusion: These findings suggest that 0.06% chlorhexidine is not ecologically neutral, and dental professionals should carefully consider the appropriateness of chlorhexidine for long-term use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.