ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2026
Barriers, Facilitators, Attitudes, and Preferences Toward Digital Mental Health Interventions Among Patients with Severe Mental Illness and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Exploration from a Low- and Middle-income Setting.
Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) offer a potential solution to bridge the considerable treatment gap in mental health service delivery. Our objectives were to qualitatively examine barriers, facilitators, attitudes, and preferences toward DMHIs among patients with severe mental illness (SMI) and their caregivers. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with remitted patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and their caregivers. A semi-structured interview guide with open-ended questions and prompts was used. Interview sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Descriptive open coding was done. Generated inductive codes were arranged first into categories and then into themes. Results: Twelve patients with SMI and 12 caregivers were interviewed. Key barriers to the use of DMHIs were perceived ineffectiveness of technology-assisted consults (compared to in-person visits), perceived adverse effects, inadequate digital literacy, cognitive barriers such as forgetting details during teleconsultations, and concerns about confidentiality. Key facilitators included convenience, wide reach and availability, willingness to adapt, shared access to devices in households, and the potential of DHMIs to increase awareness about mental illness. Attitudes toward DMHIs were ambivalent, with concerns about technology-mediated clinical interactions but openness to personalized service delivery through technology, such as medication and appointment reminders, and toll-free contact numbers for emergencies. They also emphasized the importance of raising awareness about mental illness through DMHIs. Conclusions: Patients with SMI and their caregivers identified significant structural and individual barriers to the use of DMHIs. We suggest that DMHIs for this group should be co-designed to address their needs and concerns, thereby enhancing uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.