ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Photography in dermatology.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soon after the invention of photography, doctors began experimenting with photographs as a documentation tool. The first known medical photographs were produced in the 1840s and included photographs of skin diseases and facial deformities. Dermatology was one of the first specialties to use photographs, and photography was acknowledged as more objective evidence than the drawings and illustrations used earlier. Photographs have since become an essential part of modern dermatology and are an integrated part of daily clinical practice and patient care. Tips, techniques, and guides to improve clarity, lighting, positioning, exposure, background, angles, and scale are warranted. Three basic elements are essential for high-quality medical photography: resolution, lighting, and focus. Furthermore, three key principles-background, perspective, and angles-are essential for accurately documenting a clinical condition and effectively conveying details about a lesion's location, size, color, texture, and depth. Using an even, neutral, non-reflecting, monochrome background, positioning the camera perpendicularly at the same level as the skin lesion, and taking multiple shots from different angles are recommended. This study provides a review of good techniques for capturing medical photographs of dermatological diseases for diagnostic use and describes common pitfalls in dermatological photography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.