Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643982›Full record

ReviewEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2026

Health Benefits of Air Purification: A Systematic Review.

Xiaowei Xue, Yixuan Jiang, Weijie Qian, Renjie Chen, Haidong Kan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaowei XueSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education, NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yixuan JiangSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education, NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Weijie QianAmway (China) Co., Limited, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China.
Renjie ChenSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education, NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-0820
Haidong KanSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education, NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1871-8999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air pollution is a critical global public health challenge that poses a wide range of health threats. As people spend most of their time indoors, household air pollution is a significant yet often overlooked source of exposure. Existing evidence suggests that air purification is a promising intervention to mitigate these risks. This systematic review synthesized evidence from studies published between January 1990 and August 2025 on the effectiveness of air purifiers for improving the indoor air quality and mitigating health impacts. We also assess the cost-effectiveness and identify major limitations in current research. The findings demonstrate that air purifiers significantly reduce indoor pollution levels, leading to substantial respiratory and cardiovascular benefits, particularly in high-risk populations. However, evidence of neurocognitive outcomes remains limited. Despite heterogeneity in study designs, air purifiers represent a potentially cost-effective strategy for mitigating the adverse effects from air pollution. Standardized device certification, supportive policies to improve access, and continued research to optimize intervention strategies are warranted for the future.

Indexed as

air purificationcardiorespiratory healthcost-effectivenessindoor air qualityneurocognitive function

Identifiers

PMID42643982
PMCPMC13504564

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.