Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644488›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Loneliness Biases Social Engagement Decisions: Evidence From Value-Based Choice Models.

Błażej Misiak, Wiktor Grzegorzewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Błażej MisiakDepartment of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Wiktor GrzegorzewiczDepartment of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

Wroclaw Medical University IDUB.C230.24.001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness is a well-established risk factor for adverse mental health outcomes and persistent social withdrawal. We tested whether loneliness is associated with systematic alterations in value-based social decision-making and examined mechanisms that may sustain withdrawal. Across two preregistered online studies (total N = 6517), participants were randomly assigned to positive, negative, or neutral social expectation priming and completed a vignette-based task manipulating reward, effort, and threat. Loneliness and psychopathological symptoms were assessed by self-reports. Across both studies, higher loneliness was consistently associated with a lower likelihood of engaging in social interactions, independent of vignette characteristics and expectation priming. Higher loneliness was consistently associated with lower anticipated connectedness and greater perceived rejection risk during social decision-making. Further exploratory analyses indicated that loneliness was associated with reduced sensitivity to both social reward and social threat, accompanied by diminished differentiation between high- and low-reward contexts, consistent with a compressed range of subjective social value across decision scenarios. These findings suggest that loneliness is linked to altered social valuation, characterized by blunted differentiation of social rewards and reduced motivational salience of potentially beneficial interactions, contributing to persistent withdrawal across diverse everyday social contexts.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingLonelinessSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotivationRewardYoung Adultperceived social isolationreward sensitivitysocial decisionsocial valuation

Identifiers

PMID42644488
PMCPMC13508705

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.