ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
After the Nozzle: Post-Printing Maturation, Failure Modes, and Use-Point Assessment of Cell-Laden Extrusion-Bioprinted Hydrogel Constructs.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-laden hydrogel bioinks for extrusion bioprinting are commonly evaluated by precursor rheology, extrusion behavior, and immediate shape fidelity, yet these measures do not establish whether printed constructs remain stable and functional during culture or tissue maturation. This review examines the post-printing evolution of cell-laden extrusion-printed hydrogel constructs, prioritizing direct evidence from cell-laden prints and using acellular prints and bulk hydrogels only to clarify mechanisms. Maturation is organized into immediate stabilization, network evolution and environmental equilibration, and long-term remodeling. Crosslinking, hydration, ion exchange, stress relaxation, degradation, cellular contraction, and matrix deposition may support maturation or cause structural, mechanical, interfacial, transport, and biofunctional failure. We propose a conceptual, research-oriented use-point assessment framework that compares each construct with relevant reference states and application-specific requirements after stabilization, during culture, and before intended use. The framework links the earliest observed critical deviation to relevant measurements, targeted redesign, and reassessment under the same conditions. A cartilage construct illustrates sequential evaluation of geometry, wet-state mechanics, cell distribution, and matrix formation. Current evidence is limited by inconsistent assessment times, incomplete reporting, and few integrated longitudinal studies. Future work should standardize maturation histories, model construct trajectories, and prospectively validate product-specific criteria. Evaluation should focus on the complete cell-laden extrusion-printed construct at its intended use point rather than on the freshly printed filament.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.