ArticleBiosensors2026
EEG and ECG Wearable Biosensor-Based Affective State Analysis Using Deep Learning over 6G IoT Healthcare Networks.
Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physiological signal analysis using wearable biosensors like an electroencephalogram (EEG) and an electrocardiogram (ECG) is widely investigated for affective computing; however, the integration of deep learning-based affective computing within 6G-driven IoT healthcare infrastructures remains limited, with data transmission latency posing a significant challenge. This study proposes a framework for EEG and ECG-based affective state analysis over 6G IoT networks. We utilize an attention-based deep learning model for three-class emotion recognition from EEG signals, and a ResNet50-based convolutional neural network for three-class stress/affective state classification using ECG data. The framework's communication performance is evaluated through ray tracing simulations in a virtual hospital environment at 7 GHz and 92 GHz bands. Experimental results on SEED and WESAD datasets demonstrate that the EEG model achieved 90.93% classification accuracy, while the ECG model yielded 82.26% validation and 65.64% test accuracy. Wireless analysis showed RMS delay spread values of 6.53 ns (7 GHz) and 3.32 ns (92 GHz), with correlation bandwidths of 30.63 MHz and 60.24 MHz, respectively. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of integrating wearable biosensor-based affective state analysis with 6G-oriented IoT healthcare communication frameworks, providing a robust foundation for future personalized health and human state monitoring applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.