ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Pragmatic Management of EGFR-Mutant NSCLC After Progression on Osimertinib: Canadian Expert Perspectives.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The management of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after progression on osimertinib is becoming increasingly complex, particularly in Canada, where access to diagnostic testing and newer therapies remains uneven. Although treatment is evolving with regimens such as amivantamab-lazertinib (MARIPOSA/MARIPOSA-2) and osimertinib plus chemotherapy (FLAURA2), access to such treatments in first and second lines varies across provinces. This article provides a pragmatic Canadian perspective on post-osimertinib management informed by expert roundtable discussions, a focused clinician survey, and the contemporary literature. Key challenges identified include delays and barriers related to tissue biopsy, next-generation sequencing, timely immunohistochemistry in time to influence treatment decisions and access to novel therapies. These gaps reduce the ability to individualize care and often force clinicians to rely on platinum-pemetrexed therapy as the default systemic backbone, even when biologically relevant resistance mechanisms exist, highlighting that post-osimertinib care in Canada remains shaped as much by access and system constraints as by emerging evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.