ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Temperature patterns in suspected pediatric acute appendicitis.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemperature is routinely considered in children with suspected acute appendicitis (AA), but classic appendicitis scores usually reduce it to a binary fever item. This study aimed to evaluate whether continuous temperature measurements contain diagnostic or severity-related information that may be obscured by conventional fever thresholds.
methodsWe performed a secondary exploratory analysis of the BIDIAP 2 (BIomarkers for the DIagnosis of Appendicitis in Pediatrics 2) cohort, a prospective multicenter diagnostic cohort of children evaluated for suspected AA. Two continuous temperature variables were assessed: maximum temperature reported at home before Emergency Department (ED) presentation and temperature measured at ED admission. Single-predictor logistic models evaluated temperature as a linear term, a quadratic term, and a restricted cubic spline. Apparent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), likelihood-ratio tests, bootstrap optimism correction, and literature-based fever thresholds were examined.
resultsFor AA versus non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP), maximum home temperature showed no apparent discrimination when modeled linearly (AUC, 0.494; 95% CI, 0.433-0.554), whereas quadratic and spline models yielded higher apparent AUCs of 0.617, with the highest estimated probability of AA in the low-grade fever range. ED temperature showed a similar but weaker pattern, with AUC increasing from 0.591 in the linear model to 0.613 with quadratic modeling and 0.620 with spline modeling. Among children with AA, temperature behaved more like a severity-related marker: maximum home temperature showed moderate apparent discrimination for complicated AA (AUC, 0.657), with no relevant gain from non-linear modeling. Bootstrap optimism correction modestly reduced the AUCs of non-linear models while preserving the qualitative pattern.
conclusionsTemperature showed outcome-dependent patterns in suspected pediatric acute appendicitis. The main finding was a non-linear association centered around the low-grade fever range for AA versus NSAP, contrasting with a more consistent association between higher temperature and complicated disease among children with confirmed AA. These findings support interpreting temperature according to the clinical outcome being evaluated, preserving it as a continuous clinical variable, and examining its functional form before reducing it to conventional fever thresholds in diagnostic scores or prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.