Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645583›Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2026

Antimicrobial Peptides as Eco-Innovative Therapeutics to Overcome Antifungal Pressure-Induced Resistance in Candida Infections.

Bahgat Fayed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bahgat FayedDepartment of Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research Institute, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, Giza, 12622, Egypt. bahgatfayed1982@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of Candida species as a significant cause of hospital-acquired infections poses a growing challenge in the clinical management of fungal diseases, driven by increasing antifungal resistance. Both intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms have been documented, often as a consequence of prolonged antifungal pressure, leading to treatment failures. This review explores the role of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as a potential solution to overcoming acquired resistance in Candida species, specifically targeting resistance pathways that bypass conventional antifungal treatments. AMPs act via multifaceted mechanisms, such as disrupting the fungal cell membrane, inducing mitochondrial dysfunction, and generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), which reduces the likelihood of resistance development. Furthermore, AMPs exhibit a lower propensity for resistance emergence compared to traditional antifungal drugs due to their rapid action and broad spectrum of activity. The review investigates the molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance in Candida, including genetic mutations and adaptations that occur under antifungal pressure, and discusses how AMPs can counteract these adaptive responses. It also addresses the challenges of scaling AMP production, including issues related to batch variability, cost, and metabolic stability. Industrial efforts to overcome these hurdles are examined that could enhance sustainability and cost-effectiveness. The review concludes by advocating for the use of AMPs as part of combination therapies to address the limitations of existing antifungal treatments, offering a promising alternative in the fight against multidrug-resistant Candida infections.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesCandidaCandidiasisDrug Resistance, FungalHumansAntifungal AgentsAntimicrobial Peptides

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.