ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2026
Recent advances in MR neuroimaging: toward quantitative and AI-driven brain and spinal cord imaging.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance neuroimaging is undergoing a major paradigm shift from traditional qualitative anatomical mapping toward integrated, quantitative measurement systems with biological interpretability. This review systematically synthesizes nine methodological pillars driving this transformation, encompassing advances ranging from hardware innovation to artificial intelligence algorithms. We first explore the pivotal role of deep learning in image reconstruction and acceleration, followed by detailed analyses of quantitative brain oxygen metabolism assessment, standardized spinal cord imaging frameworks, and the non-invasive monitoring of the glymphatic system using diffusion MRI. Furthermore, the review delves into tractometry, susceptibility-based myelin mapping, the clinical standardization of arterial spin labeling, and the application of radiomics in extracting high-dimensional phenotypes. Finally, the importance of open science and workflow coordination in enhancing research reproducibility is highlighted. Through the deep integration of hardware, sequences, and artificial intelligence, these technologies form a synergistic ecosystem that provides unprecedented precision tools and translational potential for both basic neuroscience research and clinical precision medicine. Across these domains, AI contributes not only to acceleration and reconstruction but also to segmentation, quality control, quantitative parameter extraction, and multiparametric pattern recognition that can support diagnostic interpretation. The quantitative emphasis of this review therefore lies in measurable outputs such as image-quality metrics, metabolic and perfusion parameters, tract-specific diffusion indices, susceptibility-based components, and radiomic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42645787What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.