Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645986›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Ordinal Deep Learning for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Grading on Sagittal MRI.

Rohan A Phadke, Samer G Salman, Zane G Salman, Akhil Marupudi, Kirtan Patel, Joshua Ong, Alireza Tavakkoli, Sainyam Galhotra, Ajay Tripuraneni, James Rizkalla and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rohan A PhadkeSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8611-6711
Samer G SalmanSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-9897-4071
Zane G SalmanCollege of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2953-1133
Akhil MarupudiMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1789-2752
Kirtan PatelEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Louisiana, Monroe, LA 71203, USA.
Joshua OngMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-827X
Alireza TavakkoliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-1269
Sainyam GalhotraDepartment of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Ajay TripuraneniSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
James RizkallaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2835-0371
Nathan J LeeMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0496-4977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar foraminal stenosis grading contributes to surgical-level selection, but automated four-grade classification remains challenging. Published pipelines for this dataset reach approximately 65% four-class accuracy, and deep classifiers offer no anatomical rationale. We investigated whether interpretable, millimeter-scale morphometry from segmentation masks improves grading beyond a deep image model. We analyzed the LSS-MRI-AISSLab sagittal T2-weighted dataset (469 patients, 2979 expert-graded foramina spanning L1-L2 through L5-S1 bilaterally on a four-grade scale). Ten morphometric descriptors were computed from mid-sagittal polygon segmentations and scaled to millimeters using each patient's recorded pixel spacing. A dual-branch network combined a fine-tuned ResNet-18 embedding of each foraminal region of interest with the morphometric vector through an ordinal regression head. Foraminal regions were supplied from expert bounding-box annotations; automated localization within the full sagittal examination was not evaluated. Four configurations (nominal softmax, appearance-only, anatomy-only, and fusion) were compared on a locked patient-level test set of 94 patients after five-fold cross-validation, with quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) as the primary endpoint and patient-clustered bootstrap inference. Feature-grade correlations were reported pooled and adjusted for lumbar level. Fusion achieved QWK 0.813 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.769-0.847) and 75.3% four-class accuracy. Appearance-only was statistically indistinguishable (QWK 0.806; delta QWK +0.006, 95% CI -0.023 to 0.036,

Indexed as

deep learningimage segmentationinterpretable machine learninglumbar foraminal stenosismorphometryordinal classificationspinal decompressionspine MRI

Identifiers

PMID42645986
PMCPMC13514485

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.