Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42646204›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026

Hydrogel Implementing Drug Delivery in Cranial Bone Tissue Engineering.

Martina Salvati, Alessia Vita, Alessandro Arcovito, Ornella Parolini, Federica Tiberio, Wanda Lattanzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martina SalvatiDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Alessia VitaDipartimento Scienze Della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro ArcovitoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8384-4844
Ornella ParoliniDipartimento Scienze Della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5211-6430
Federica TiberioDipartimento Scienze Della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Wanda LattanziDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3092-4936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial bone defects remain a significant clinical challenge due to their limited intrinsic regenerative capacity and the complexity of coordinating osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune responses within a confined and poorly vascularised environment. Conventional approaches, including autologous grafts and synthetic implants, provide structural support but fail to actively modulate the biological processes required for effective bone regeneration. In this context, hydrogel-based systems have emerged as versatile platforms for localized and controlled drug delivery in cranial bone tissue engineering (BTE). This review provides a comprehensive overview of hydrogel-based delivery strategies designed to regulate the spatiotemporal presentation of bioactive agents within cranial defects. The main classes of hydrogels, natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic, and hybrid systems, are discussed in relation to their physicochemical properties and suitability for drug delivery applications. Current delivery approaches are analysed, including cell-free systems (growth factors, peptides, bioactive ions, nucleic acids, and small molecules drugs), cell-based platforms, and multifunctional systems integrating secondary carriers such as nanoparticles (NPs), microparticles (MPs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs). Particular emphasis is placed on how hydrogel design parameters, including crosslinking density, degradation kinetics, and responsiveness to microenvironmental cues, govern therapeutic release and influence regenerative outcomes. Emerging strategies and key translational challenges are also highlighted.

Indexed as

controlled releasecranial bone tissue engineeringhydrogel-based drug deliveryregenerative medicinesmart biomaterials

Identifiers

PMID42646204
PMCPMC13514382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.