ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Hydrogel Implementing Drug Delivery in Cranial Bone Tissue Engineering.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cranial bone defects remain a significant clinical challenge due to their limited intrinsic regenerative capacity and the complexity of coordinating osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune responses within a confined and poorly vascularised environment. Conventional approaches, including autologous grafts and synthetic implants, provide structural support but fail to actively modulate the biological processes required for effective bone regeneration. In this context, hydrogel-based systems have emerged as versatile platforms for localized and controlled drug delivery in cranial bone tissue engineering (BTE). This review provides a comprehensive overview of hydrogel-based delivery strategies designed to regulate the spatiotemporal presentation of bioactive agents within cranial defects. The main classes of hydrogels, natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic, and hybrid systems, are discussed in relation to their physicochemical properties and suitability for drug delivery applications. Current delivery approaches are analysed, including cell-free systems (growth factors, peptides, bioactive ions, nucleic acids, and small molecules drugs), cell-based platforms, and multifunctional systems integrating secondary carriers such as nanoparticles (NPs), microparticles (MPs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs). Particular emphasis is placed on how hydrogel design parameters, including crosslinking density, degradation kinetics, and responsiveness to microenvironmental cues, govern therapeutic release and influence regenerative outcomes. Emerging strategies and key translational challenges are also highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.