ReviewMetabolites2026
Rhythmic Metabolism in Osteosarcopenia: Emerging Evidence, a Chronometabolomic Framework for the Bone-Muscle Unit, and Research Priorities.
Review in Metabolites, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcopenia combines low bone mass or skeletal fragility with sarcopenia, yet its metabolic biology is commonly assessed using single-time-point measurements. We conducted a structured narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase and Scopus from inception through 28 June 2026, supplemented by ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and citation chaining. Evidence was classified as direct human osteosarcopenia evidence, indirect human evidence, preclinical evidence or conceptual inference. Here, chronometabolomics denotes time-anchored or repeated metabolomic profiling used to estimate variation in phase, amplitude and pathway coordination in relation to sleep, feeding, activity and endocrine timing. Direct human evidence remains scarce. Component-specific human studies and experimental models suggest, but do not establish, that aging, chronic disease and irregular schedules may alter glucose-insulin, amino-acid, lipid, mitochondrial, redox-inflammatory, mineral-endocrine and microbial rhythms relevant to the bone-muscle unit. Chronometabolomics is therefore an emerging research framework, not a validated diagnostic or therapeutic approach. Daytime light, sleep regularization, protein distribution, time-restricted eating, exercise timing and medication timing remain candidates for controlled trials rather than current clinical recommendations; safety evaluation must address frailty, low body mass index, malnutrition, kidney disease, diabetes, polypharmacy, falls and inadequate protein or calcium intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.