ReviewNeuroSci2026
Overcoming Perfusion Impairment in the Ischemic Brain: A Review.
Review in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perfusion impairment is one of the major barriers to using machine perfusion to prepare brain tissue for research and clinical applications. As ischemia progresses, multiple mechanisms, including intravascular obstructions, perivascular cellular edema, mural cell contraction, and vessel wall breakdown, progressively limit the uniform delivery of preservative solutions. This problem is particularly important for connectomics, wherein successful preservation requires both widespread distribution of preservative chemicals and the maintenance of the cellular ultrastructure needed for circuit reconstruction. We conducted a narrative review of interventions used to ameliorate perfusion impairment across multiple fields, including organ transplantation, resuscitation medicine, forensic pathology, embalming, and neuroscience. We evaluated the evidence for these approaches in their original contexts and considered their potential application for brain banking aimed at preserving tissue for connectome reconstruction. We classify interventions into several categories, including anticoagulants, fibrinolytics, vasodilators, washout solutions, surfactants, osmotic agents, colloids, hypothermia, and perfusion pressure optimization. Many of these interventions have the potential to improve perfusion, but each also carries tradeoffs that may adversely affect tissue preservation. As connectomics advances toward profiling larger volumes of human brain tissue, overcoming perfusion impairment is likely to become an increasingly important challenge. This review provides a mechanistic framework for evaluating existing interventions and guiding the development of future perfusion protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.