ArticleToxics2026
QSAR Models for Climate Impact Assessment: Born to Be Sustainable.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Global Warming Potential (GWP) is among the metrics used as midpoints in the Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) phase of the Life Cycle Assessment. However, GWP values are not always available. In recent years, predictive modelling approaches have been increasingly developed to address existing data gaps. In this study, new Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models were developed to support climate impact assessment by predicting GWP and Radiative Efficiency of chemicals from the molecular structure. These models, which are built using Multiple Linear Regression, are designed to comply with the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) principles for QSAR use for regulatory purposes: they are transparent, validated, characterized by a quantitative domain of applicability and based on interpretable molecular descriptors. These QSARs are characterized by lower complexity, in terms of the number and type of descriptors, and easier applicability than other models with similar performance available in the literature for the same endpoints. A dedicated case study shows how the new QSARs can be applied to screen a large dataset including more than 13,000 possible alternatives to harmful chemicals. These results show that the new models may be suggested as valuable support in LCIA procedure and for the screening of environmentally preferable and safer alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.