Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42647243›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026

Improving Severe Combined Immunodeficiency and Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening by Replacing Current Tests with First-Tier Targeted Gene Sequencing.

Bennett O V Shum, Carel Pretorius, Ilya Henner, Emre Basar, Urs Wilgen, Glenn Bennett, Jacobus P J Ungerer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bennett O V ShumPreventive Health Division, Genepath, Sydney, NSW 2067, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-7233
Carel PretoriusDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-3995
Ilya HennerPreventive Health Division, Genepath, Sydney, NSW 2067, Australia.
Emre BasarPreventive Health Division, Genepath, Sydney, NSW 2067, Australia.
Urs WilgenDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1364-4783
Glenn BennettPreventive Health Division, Genepath, Sydney, NSW 2067, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4593-1581
Jacobus P J UngererDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4929-0929

Funding

Genepath N/aPathology Queensland N/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening benefits children with rare diseases by enabling early detection and intervention, which improves health outcomes. False-positive results are one harm of screening, with infants subject to further testing to resolve a positive screen and parents susceptible to psychosocial distress while awaiting the results. Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and cystic fibrosis (CF) screening using immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) have high false-positive rates, with more than five infants screening positive and unaffected, for each child diagnosed. We used first-tier targeted gene sequencing (TGS) to prospectively screen 3025 newborns for CF, SCID and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and compared the results to current screening protocols using multiplex qPCR and IRT. TGS identified one infant with CF, missed by the IRT assay, and detected an infant with SMA, who screened positive with multiplex qPCR. TGS had zero false-positive results for SCID, CF and SMA. By contrast, multiplex qPCR and IRT screening protocols had approximately nine false positives for each child diagnosed with CF (positive predictive value, PPV 10.00%) and SCID (PPV 10.13%). Replacing current SCID and CF screening protocols with TGS would reduce NBS false positives and may result in a higher sensitivity for CF. TGS sensitivity and specificity would be comparable to qPCR for SMA. A larger trial is required to determine TGS sensitivity and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

genomic newborn screeningnewborn bloodspot screeningnewborn screeningnext-generation DNA sequencingnext-generation sequencingtargeted gene sequencingtargeted genomics

Identifiers

PMID42647243
PMCPMC13511433

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.