ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Improving Severe Combined Immunodeficiency and Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening by Replacing Current Tests with First-Tier Targeted Gene Sequencing.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Newborn screening benefits children with rare diseases by enabling early detection and intervention, which improves health outcomes. False-positive results are one harm of screening, with infants subject to further testing to resolve a positive screen and parents susceptible to psychosocial distress while awaiting the results. Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and cystic fibrosis (CF) screening using immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) have high false-positive rates, with more than five infants screening positive and unaffected, for each child diagnosed. We used first-tier targeted gene sequencing (TGS) to prospectively screen 3025 newborns for CF, SCID and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and compared the results to current screening protocols using multiplex qPCR and IRT. TGS identified one infant with CF, missed by the IRT assay, and detected an infant with SMA, who screened positive with multiplex qPCR. TGS had zero false-positive results for SCID, CF and SMA. By contrast, multiplex qPCR and IRT screening protocols had approximately nine false positives for each child diagnosed with CF (positive predictive value, PPV 10.00%) and SCID (PPV 10.13%). Replacing current SCID and CF screening protocols with TGS would reduce NBS false positives and may result in a higher sensitivity for CF. TGS sensitivity and specificity would be comparable to qPCR for SMA. A larger trial is required to determine TGS sensitivity and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.