ArticleBMJ global health2026
Impact of Russian invasion on radiation therapy capacity in Ukraine: a national survey study.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study evaluated the operational status of Ukrainian radiotherapy (RT) centres to characterise wartime capacity following the Russian invasion and to identify priorities for improving RT delivery and resilience.
methodsThis cross-sectional study integrated two data sources: (1) a 38-item survey conducted by Help Ukraine Group (HUG) in August 2025 across all Ukrainian RT departments, assessing patient volumes, waiting times, equipment status, cobalt-60 (Co-60) source replacement, staffing, training needs and operational challenges; and (2) International Atomic Energy Agency DIRAC datasets collected by the Grigoriev Institute (2021-2025), tracking equipment, staffing and patient volumes. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed.
resultsIn December 2021, before the full-scale invasion, Ukraine operated 41 RT departments with 82 megavoltage (MV) machines (38 linear accelerators, 44 Co-60 units), 53 orthovoltage units and 36 brachytherapy afterloaders. During the first 3 months of war, four centres were occupied, most departments experienced service disruptions averaging 26 days and patient volume declined by 27.5%. Volumes recovered to baseline in 2023 and increased by 8.9% in 2024 and 9.3% in 2025 relative to 2021.In December 2025, Ukraine operated 42 RT departments with 96 MV machines (68 linear accelerators, 28 Co-60 units), 38 orthovoltage units and 34 afterloaders. However, 56% of departments still relied on Co-60 and 94.1% reported future source replacement would be unfeasible because sources were historically procured from Russia. Consequently, 78.6% of Co-60 users planned the transition to linear accelerators. Workforce shortages remain critical, with reported deficits of 41.4% for medical physicists, 33.6% for RTTs and 21.1% for radiation oncologists. Average waiting times increased from 6.4 days in 2021 to 10.3 days in 2025.
conclusionDespite ongoing war, Ukraine is actively modernising RT services, with a rapid transition from Co-60 to linear accelerators. Workforce development and targeted training are now urgently needed to convert equipment investment into sustainable clinical capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.