ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
External incentives change the relation between confidence and epistemic curiosity.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epistemic curiosity, defined as the desire for knowledge, is commonly viewed as an intrinsic, non-instrumental (i.e., not directed toward immediate tangible benefits) drive to seek information. Prior research has shown that epistemic curiosity is influenced by subjective confidence - the perceived certainty individuals hold regarding their knowledge or decisions. Recent evidence suggests that environmental structure determines whether curiosity is driven by low- or medium-confidence stimuli. However, the role of external incentives in shaping the curiosity-confidence relationship remains poorly understood. To address this gap, the present study directly compared curiosity and subsequent information-seeking behaviors across conditions with and without performance-based extrinsic incentives. In Experiment 1 (no incentives), participants shifted from randomly selecting questions to focusing on medium-confidence questions as learning opportunities increased. In contrast, in Experiment 2 (with incentives), participants consistently prioritized low-confidence questions to maximize their knowledge and test scores. These findings demonstrate that extrinsic incentives significantly alter individuals' information-seeking strategies, underscoring the importance of integrating both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to optimize learning. Our results suggest that a full understanding of the curiosity-confidence link requires explicit separation between studies conducted with and without extrinsic rewards, a distinction often overlooked in prior research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42649439What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.