ReviewCancers2026
25 Years of Cancer Immunoediting: Dendritic Cells and Macrophages Filled the Missing Gap.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 1909, Paul Ehrlich first suggested that the immune system is critical for suppressing carcinogenesis and cancer growth, which led to the introduction of cancer immunosurveillance by Sir MacFarlane Burnet in 1960. Burnet's cancer immunosurveillance was further supported and elaborated by Thomas Lewis in 1982, who noted, for example, the limitations of investigating cancer immunosurveillance in available experimental models, except for virus-induced cancers. The concept of cancer immunosurveillance in 2001 was revised to cancer immunoediting (the immunoediting term was introduced by Dr. Rober Schreiber), based on findings that the immune system not only controls tumorigenesis and tumor growth but also tumor quality/grade or immunogenicity. Advances in immunology, including the identification of target organs and the local immune system, and the identification of novel innate immune cells regulating the adaptive immune response, have further advanced the understanding of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. The current article discusses the evolution of the cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis into cancer immunoediting. At the time of the introduction of cancer immunoediting, the direct role of dendritic cells (DCs) in tumor immunity and immunoediting was not much explored. Similarly, the concept of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and their role in cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting was not much studied. The current article discusses the evolution of DCs and TAMs in the context of tumor immunity, cancer immunoediting, and immunotherapies specifically targeting these innate immune cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.