ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Individualized Therapeutic Environments for Pain Management in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesChildren with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) present unique challenges in pain assessment and management because of differences in communication, sensory processing, and pain expression, increasing the risk of pain underrecognition and inadequate treatment. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize current evidence on pain processing, expression, assessment, and management in children with ASD, identify available pain assessment tools and interventions, and examine the contribution of individualized therapeutic environments to pain management.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies published between January 2020 and December 2025. Search strategies combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms. Two reviewers independently screened studies extracted data using a standardized form, and synthesized findings narratively. No formal methodological quality appraisal was undertaken, consistent with PRISMA-ScR recommendations.
resultsIncluded studies demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in pain perception and expression, with atypical behavioral responses, sensory differences, and communication difficulties frequently hindering pain recognition. Individualized, multidimensional pain assessment integrating behavioral observation, caregiver reports, and validated assessment tools was consistently supported. Sensory adaptations, tailored communication strategies, caregiver involvement, distraction techniques, and virtual reality showed potential to improve pain-related experiences and reduce procedural distress. However, evidence remained predominantly observational, methodologically heterogeneous, and limited by few psychometrically validated ASD-specific assessment instruments and the absence of standardized clinical protocols.
conclusionsCurrent evidence supports individualized, multidisciplinary pain assessment and management for children with ASD. Nevertheless, substantial evidence gaps remain, highlighting the need for validated ASD-specific assessment tools, standardized clinical protocols, and high-quality studies evaluating pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and technology-assisted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.