ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Extruded Pseudocereal Snacks Mathematical Modelling Approaches for Prediction and Optimisation: A Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudocereals such as quinoa, amaranth, and buckwheat have attracted increasing attention as ingredients for extruded snack products because of their nutritional value, gluten-free status, and content of bioactive compounds. The quality of extruded products is governed by complex interactions among processing variables, including barrel temperature, screw speed, feed moisture content, and formulation characteristics. As a result, mathematical modelling has become an important tool for predicting product properties and identifying suitable processing conditions. This review summarizes modelling approaches applied to extruded food products with a focus on pseudocereal extrusion. Particular emphasis is placed on response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural networks (ANNs), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS), support vector regression (SVR), and hybrid optimisation strategies. Published studies indicate that RSM remains the most commonly used approach because of its simplicity and interpretability, while ANN-based models generally provide much higher predictive accuracy when strong nonlinear relationships are present. The widespread use of small experimental datasets and limited external validation remains a major challenge for the practical implementation of advanced machine-learning models. This review examines the strengths and limitations of current modelling approaches and discusses future opportunities for integrating predictive models with digital manufacturing frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.