ReviewBiomedicines2026
Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis in Atopic Dermatitis: Pathogenic Mechanisms, Gut-Skin Axis Disruption, and Emerging Microbiota-Targeted Therapies.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Gut-Skin Axis in Atopic Dermatitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanisms, Microbiota, and Therapeutic Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by epidermal barrier dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and marked clinical heterogeneity. Growing evidence implicates the gut microbiome in AD-related pathways through microbial metabolites, intestinal barrier function, and systemic immune signaling. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on gut microbial alterations in AD, with particular attention to short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan-derived aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands, intestinal permeability, gut-skin microbiome interactions, and microbiota-targeted interventions. Human studies have reported associations between AD and altered abundance of selected microbial taxa, metabolite profiles, and markers of intestinal barrier dysfunction, whereas animal and in vitro studies provide complementary mechanistic evidence. However, findings remain heterogeneous across age groups, disease phenotypes, geographic populations, analytical platforms, and treatment exposures, and causality is incompletely established. Probiotic and synbiotic interventions have shown strain-specific and context-dependent effects, while postbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, washed microbiota transplantation, and metabolite-directed approaches remain investigational. AI-assisted multi-omics methods may improve biological stratification and hypothesis generation, but current applications are limited by small sample sizes, cohort heterogeneity, overfitting, insufficient external validation, and limited clinical implementation. Current evidence therefore supports the gut microbiome as a mechanistically plausible contributor, potential biomarker, and therapeutic target in AD while underscoring the need for longitudinal, phenotype-aware, and externally validated studies before routine clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.