ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Connected by Nature: Nature-Based Intervention to Support Young Adults with Advanced Cancer.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesYoung adults living with advanced cancer often experience substantial psychological and existential health challenges, while frequently being underserved by existing rehabilitative and palliative services. This mixed-methods study evaluated the effects and experiences of a nature-based intervention designed to ease the burden of distress and support coping in the context of an incurable illness.
methodsFour consecutive intervention groups participated in a six-week program consisting of one overnight nature camp and three outdoor sessions. Quantitative data on quality of life (FACT-G) were collected before and after each intervention cycle. At the session level, pre-post measures assessed distress, vitality, resilience, and perceived connectedness. Qualitative data consisted of post-intervention semi-structured group interviews.
resultsTwenty-four participants completed the intervention. No significant change was observed in overall quality of life which is in line with expectations for palliative interventions for individuals with incurable illness. In contrast, session-level analyses showed consistent reductions in distress and increases in vitality, resilience, and connectedness across multiple domains. The qualitative findings indicated that the intervention provided a supportive context for emotional regulation, coping, social belonging and existential orientation.
conclusionsTogether, the findings support that nature-based rehabilitative palliation may offer meaningful support for young adults living with advanced cancer. The study underscores the importance of multi-level mixed-methods evaluation for capturing the value of palliative interventions where temporality and situational benefit constitute central outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.