Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Community-Based Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Metabolic Syndrome in Chile: A Comparative Reanalysis of an Integrated Exercise and Health Education Program.
Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome is a major public health concern, yet evidence from structured community-based interventions in Latin America remains limited. This study conducted a comparative reanalysis of an 18-week program implemented in Talca, Chile, that combined supervised aerobic exercise, health education, and clinical monitoring. The analysis included archived data from 80 adults with metabolic syndrome who had originally been randomly allocated using SPSS to an intervention group (n=33) or a usual-care comparison group (n=47). Anthropometric, biochemical, cardiovascular, body-composition, functional-capacity, and estimated cardiorespiratory-fitness outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 18 weeks. At the post-intervention assessment, the intervention group showed greater Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance, higher 6MWT-based estimates of cardiorespiratory fitness, lower waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, triglycerides, body weight, body fat percentage, and fat mass, and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and muscle mass percentage than the comparison group. Within the intervention group, body weight, body fat percentage, and fat mass decreased, whereas muscle mass and 6MWT distance increased. These findings indicate that participation in the integrated program was associated with favorable cardiometabolic, body-composition, and functional outcomes. The results support further prospective evaluation of this community-based model within primary healthcare and public health settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.