Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42652626›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Circulating Tumor DNA for Minimal Residual Disease Detection and Recurrence Prediction in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Scoping Review.

Loizos Hadjigeorgiou, Melina Yerolatsite, Nanteznta Torounidou, George Zarkavelis, Dimitrios Schizas, Vasileios Tatsis, Stefano Rausei, Konstantinos Vlachos, Georgios D Lianos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Loizos HadjigeorgiouDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0009-0005-0063-6361
Melina YerolatsiteDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0009-0007-6325-8649
Nanteznta TorounidouDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.
George ZarkavelisDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5961-2237
Dimitrios SchizasFirst Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7046-0112
Vasileios TatsisDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.
Stefano RauseiGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Cittiglio-Angera Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-2935
Konstantinos VlachosDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.
Georgios D LianosDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising non-invasive biomarker for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) and predicting recurrence after curative treatment, yet evidence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and gastric cancer has largely been examined within individual tumor types. In this scoping review, we mapped this evidence across all three malignancies and clarified key methodological and clinical considerations. Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (3 April 2026) for studies linking ctDNA to disease-free, recurrence-free, or overall survival after curative-intent treatment. Twenty-seven studies (1746 patients; 10 ESCC, 4 EAC, 8 gastric, and 5 mixed) were included. Across every tumor type, postoperative ctDNA MRD was the most informative timepoint, with independent multivariable hazard ratios for disease-free, recurrence-free, or event-free survival of 2.8 to 21.8, whereas preoperative ctDNA was seldom prognostic. Serial monitoring further improved performance and flagged recurrence 78 to 278 days before imaging. Tumor-informed assays showed higher sensitivity than tumor-agnostic ones (80% vs. 35%), though direct comparisons were limited; correction for clonal hematopoiesis was essential for tumor-agnostic assays, and blood-based assays performed poorly in diffuse-type and peritoneal disease. Postoperative ctDNA MRD is a consistent, independent prognostic biomarker across upper gastrointestinal cancers that adds prognostic information beyond conventional staging and pathological response, supporting prospective interventional trials of ctDNA-guided management.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNActDNAesophageal cancergastric cancerliquid biopsyminimal residual diseaseprognosisrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID42652626
PMCPMC13513700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.