ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Residual Atherothrombotic Risk After Myocardial Infarction: Integrating Lipid, Inflammatory and Thrombotic Pathways.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite major advances in reperfusion strategies and guideline-directed medical therapy, patients surviving myocardial infarction (MI) remain at substantial risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Among the multiple determinants of post-MI cardiovascular risk, persistent atherothrombotic vulnerability remains a major therapeutic challenge despite guideline-directed secondary prevention. This review provides an integrated overview of residual atherothrombotic risk after MI, focusing on the complementary roles of lipid, inflammatory, and thrombotic pathways. Current evidence supports the use of biomarkers such as apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein(a), remnant cholesterol, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to improve risk stratification beyond LDL-C. Landmark clinical trials have demonstrated that intensive lipid-lowering therapy, selected anti-inflammatory agents, and individualized antithrombotic strategies can further reduce recurrent cardiovascular events in appropriately selected patients. However, these pathogenic pathways rarely occur in isolation and frequently overlap, generating heterogeneous residual risk phenotypes. We propose a pragmatic multi-layered model in which lipid, inflammatory, and thrombotic mechanisms are viewed as interconnected biological processes rather than independent entities. This framework supports a personalized approach to secondary prevention based on comprehensive risk assessment, targeted therapeutic intensification, and longitudinal reassessment. Integrating these complementary domains may provide a framework for more individualized secondary prevention after MI, although its clinical utility requires prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.