ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Efficacy of Exercise Modalities for Motor Function Recovery After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise rehabilitation (ER) has become an important treatment regimen during the recovery phase of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Optimal exercise prescriptions for post-stroke motor recovery remain controversial.
methodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched through November 2025. The Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB 1) assessment tool was utilized to assess the risk of bias in the original studies.
resultsThis study included 66 trials comprising 3675 patients. For balance, whole-body tilting postural training (WTPT), unilateral strength training (UST) and robot-assisted unilateral gait training (RAUGT) showed high SUCRA rankings. Activities of daily living likely improved most with robot-assisted Tai Chi training (RATCT), home rehabilitation guidance (HRG) and robot-assisted gait training (RAGT). Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) gains appeared greatest following robot-assisted hand training with electrical stimulation (RAHT + ES), neural inhibition therapy (NIT) and graded motor imagery with electrical stimulation (GMI + ES). Walking endurance seemed most responsive to visual feedback training (VFT), UST and visual aids training (VAT), while functional mobility showed greatest improvement with tilt sensor-assisted gait training with electrical stimulation (TAGT + ES), gait training (GT) and virtual reality therapy with motor imagery (VRT + MI).
conclusionsThis study provides the first comprehensive evidence synthesis evaluating the comparative effectiveness of specific exercise modalities across distinct recovery domains after AIS. Rather than supporting generic interventions, the findings highlight the distinct comparative advantages of various emerging technologies and traditional practices. These results offer an evidence-based framework for clinicians to optimize post-stroke rehabilitation protocols and highlight priority areas for future research on dose-response and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.