ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Are Sulfates of the Hydroxyl Amino Acids Threonine and Serine Truly Extremely Rare or Do They Simply Escape Detection?
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sulfonation is important for bioactivity across species-substrates range from small molecules to proteins, in which almost exclusively tyrosine sulfonation (sTyr) has been investigated. Although sulfoalkyl-hydroxyl amino acid residues in peptides and proteins have rarely been found, we will argue that it is highly likely that sSer and sThr are much more abundant than is currently evident. In the context of the recent detection of sThr-containing adipokinetic hormones in insects, the literature was screened to answer questions about the relative stability (lability) of the sulfate moiety at Tyr, Ser and Thr that may explain the historic abundance of sTyr reports; to ascertain if there are special grounds for finding sSer and sThr peptides in insects, and whether specific enzymes (sulfotransferases and sulfatases) involved in the biochemistry of sulfonation are documented in insects. Finally, we assessed detection methods for sThr and sSer-containing peptides to achieve greater accuracy. Our literature screening could not supply a special reason for the preferential formation of sThr/sSer in insects. Although the analysis of sulfonated molecules is challenging because of the lability of the sulfate group, sThr/sSer do not seem to be at a greater disadvantage compared to sTyr; it was even experimentally found that they are more stable than commonly reported. For untargeted studies of sulfoproteomes, special enrichment strategies are still required to identify these sulfonated peptides. Mass spectrometry is very valuable for the detection of the modification, but methods need to be adjusted, because sulfur trioxide is easily lost during measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.