ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Toward Standardized Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in Tendon Healing: Integrating Biological Characterization with Clinical Translation.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as one of the most extensively investigated orthobiologic therapies for tendon disorders because of its potential to modulate inflammation, enhance extracellular matrix remodeling, and promote tissue regeneration through the delivery of concentrated platelets and bioactive molecules. However, despite compelling biological rationale and encouraging preclinical evidence, clinical outcomes remain inconsistent across different tendon pathologies. This narrative review critically examines the principal biological and methodological factors underlying this variability, including differences in cellular composition, growth factor and cytokine profiles, activation strategies, and current PRP classification systems. We further synthesize the available clinical evidence across major tendon disorders, highlighting the influence of disease-specific biology, product heterogeneity, and procedural variability on treatment response. In addition, the emerging role of quantitative imaging biomarkers in objectively evaluating tendon regeneration is discussed as a complementary tool for biological outcome assessment. Based on the evidence reviewed, we propose the quantifiable platelet-rich plasma (Q-PRP) framework, a practical reporting model that integrates cellular, molecular, procedural, and clinical variables into a standardized approach for biologically meaningful PRP characterization. Rather than replacing existing classification systems, the proposed framework aims to improve reproducibility, facilitate cross-study comparison, and support the transition toward precision regenerative medicine. Standardized biological characterization, combined with objective outcome assessment, may represent a critical step toward optimizing PRP research and clinical application in tendon healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.