ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
From Joint Loading to Osteoarthritis: A Multiscale Review of Knee Mechanobiology and Digital Modelling.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The knee is a mechanically demanding synovial organ in which joint loading, tissue deformation, cellular mechanotransduction and matrix turnover are coupled. This narrative review critically links those scales and asks where the evidence is sufficiently mature for mechanistic or clinical inference. PubMed/MEDLINE and Europe PMC were searched from database inception to 20 July 2026 using structured terms for knee biomechanics, cartilage and osteochondral mechanobiology, finite element modelling, mechanosensitive channels, osteoarthritis, machine learning and digital twins. Landmark studies were selected for foundational models, while recent studies were prioritised for causal experiments, validation and translation. Instrumented implants show that common activities generate tibiofemoral forces of several times body weight, but tissue-level exposure also depends on muscle co-contraction, geometry and material properties. Biphasic and fibril-reinforced models explain how those loads become stress, strain, fluid pressure and osmotic signals. At the cell scale, TRPV4 and PIEZO1/2 participate in overlapping, context-dependent calcium signalling rather than a universal protective-pathological binary; most causal evidence remains preclinical. Osteoarthritis is therefore framed as a mechanically amplified feedback process involving cartilage, bone, synovium and systemic modifiers. Computational degeneration models and machine-learning surrogates are increasingly informative, although prospective validation, parameter identifiability and uncertainty propagation remain limiting. The review's added value is an explicit transmission-and-validation framework that connects whole-joint observables to molecular responses while labelling the evidence source and translational readiness at every step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.